(d) to be fixed by the said Court and proffer his claim to the amount in Court.
That in the event of no such person appearing within the time so to be fixed that the said property should be sold and the proceeds, less the costs, should be paid into Court to the credit of the said Information and Suit and to abide further Order of the Court.
#On the 12th day of May in the said year 1885 that the said sum of $7374.54 standing to the credit of Wong Acheong be paid out and the same was accordingly paid out to your Petitioner.
"That $2220 portion of the said sum paid into the said Court on or about the 12th May 1865 in pursuance of an Order of that date, and $3609.54 further portion of the said sum paid into the said Court on the 5th August 1868.
While fully belonging to your Petitioner, was until recently granted in terms of the prayer of the said Petition and fixed three months as the time within which the said Wong et Cheong could come forward and substantiate his claim to the said rent and premises.
The said property was sold by public auction on the 10th day of July in the year 1868 when one Pangetyin was declared to be the highest bidder "On the 11th day of December 1868 an Order was made by the Supreme Court vesting the said property in the said Pangetyin.
A sum of $3694.75 was paid into Court as net proceeds of the said sale, and a sum $3679.79 was received for rents.
On the 12th November 1884 your Petitioner applied to the said Court for payment of the said sums of $3694.75 and $3679.79 making an aggregate total of $7,374.54, the amount so received and paid in as aforesaid, and enquiries having been made, and on supplying the necessary evidence, your Petitioner was paid.
Your Petitioner was aware that certain property had been sold, but in total ignorance as to what had been done with the proceeds of sale, that was the sole reason for not applying for payment earlier.
Your Petitioner has ascertained through inquiries that all money, so paid into Court aforesaid, is paid into some Bank on current account, and interest received thereon.
Through no fault of your Petitioner, he never received the said sum of $7,374.54 till the said 24 March 1885, and from the said 12th May 1865 and the 5th August 1868 the said sums of $2220 and $3609.54 respectively earned interest, which was received by the Government of Hongkong, and to which your Petitioner humbly submits he is justly entitled, though his application for the same to His Excellency the Officer Administering the Government of Hong Kong has been refused.
Your Petitioner therefore humbly...
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
(d)
to be fixed by the said Court and proffer hisclaim
to the amount in Court.
That in the event of nos
event of no such person appearing
>
to substantiate his claims to the said premises. and tent withen the time so to be fixed that the said properly should be sold and the proceeds, less the costs, should be paid into leourt to the credit the
said Duformation and Suit and to abide further Order of the leourt.
#
On the 12th day of May in the said
Order
ACA
any
year
446
the March 1885 that the said sum
2.4.c.
made on the 24
of $7374
54
standing to the credit of Wong Acheong be paid out and the same was accordingly paid
out to your
Petitioner.
"That $2220 portion of the
10AI
• portion of the said sumne paid into the said Court
ow or
of
about
the 12th May 1865 in pursuance of an Order of that
75
dale, and $3.6094. 20 further portion of the said sun
paid into the said Court
54
77.
$7374
54.
th
of
8
of $7374. August 1868.
While fully
belonging to
your
Petitioner.
was until recently
1865 an
granted in terms of the prayer of the said Polition and fixed three months as the time within which the said Wong et Cheong chould come forward and substantiute his claim
to the said, rent and premises.
The said property
PangeAyim.
was sold by public auction the 10th day of July in the year 1868 when one
was declared to be the highest bidder "On the 11th day of Decauber 1868 an Order. was made by the Supreme Court vesting the said
property in the said Pangetyin.
A
Juvw
of $3694. 75 was paid into Court as net proceeds of the said sale, and a sum $3679. 79 was received for routs.
of
Petitioner
out to him
On the 12th November 1884 your applied to the said Court for paquent of the said sumes of $3694. 75 and $3679. 7 q niaking an aggregate total of $7.374. 544, the amount so received and paid in as
aforesaid, and enquiries having boon made, and ou supplying the
ou your Order
noce a sary
Ru
idence,
av
Petitioner
was
9.
10.
the 5th
aware that certain property
Petitioner had been sold,
your
total ignorance
e as
and
to what had been done with the proceeds of sale, that was the sole reason for not applying for payment
to over.
Your Petitioner has accertained through
that all
aa
>
inquiries
money, so paid into Court aforesaid, is paid into sonce Bank on current account, and interest received thereon.
the
(2220 and
Through no fault of your Petitioner, he never received the said sum of $7/374.54 till the said 24 March 1885, and from the said 12th May 1865 and the 5th August 1868 the said sumus of $= $3694,
10, respectively earned interest, which was received by the Tovernment of Hongkong, and to
Velitioner humbly submits he is justly outitled, though his application for the same to "iis Excellency the officer Administering the Government of "HongKong has been refused
which
your
WE
"Your Petitioner therefore humbly
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.